Encyclopaedia Arcana #56: Normals and Magic (Part Two)

So what is the explanation for why magic goes largely undetected?  The answer lies in the difference between normals and sensitives.

Normal Distribution

Normals make up the vast majority of the human population of the world.  The exact proportion is hard to settle on, since there isn’t a clear cut-off between normals and sensitives – it’s a continuum rather than a hard division.  Stricter definitions of sensitive place the normal population as high as 99%, while more lenient ones put the fraction of normals at 80%-90%, with a ‘in-between’ group of sensitive normals occupying most of the remaining 10%-20%.  All mages, however, agree that normals are dominant.

Normals are physically, physiologically, and genetically similar to sensitives, adepts, and mages as far as any test has been able to establish.  Normals aren’t aware of the distinction, and in fact have little reason to believe that there’s any distinction in the first place.  Nevertheless normals are quite different from sensitives, and this difference lies in how they perceive the world.

A Normal Point Of View

The distinguishing feature of normals – what makes them normals rather than sensitives – is their inability to perceive magic.  Sensitives can pick up rudimentary magical auras:  they can’t analyse them in the detail that a mage could, but they can generally sense when something magical is going on.  Normals can’t.  It’s like being blind, except that instead of just being unable to perceive magic, this manifests as an active aversion to perceiving or recognising it.

What this means in practice is that when brought into contact with magic, a normal will come to some explanation that doesn’t require accepting the existence of magic as a premise (i.e. an incorrect one).  It doesn’t matter what they see, hear, or are told, the conclusion they’ll come to will almost never be “that was magic”.  In fact, they’ll believe virtually any other explanation before they’ll believe the magic one, even ones that are so patently ridiculous that the existence of magic starts to look quite sensible in comparison.

Novices tend to have a hard time accepting this.  The common objection is something along the lines of “but if you just cast a fireball they’ll have to believe it then”.  The answer is “no, they won’t”.  This comes up often enough that it’s worth going into in detail, so we’ll examine the following hypothetical exchange between a normal and an (increasingly frustrated) novice fire mage.

Fire Bad

• Approach #1: Honesty

Mage:  “So, I can cast fire spells.”
Normal:  “Sure you can, buddy.”

• Approach #2: Testimony

Mage:  “Here are ten other people who’ll tell you I can cast fire spells.”
Normal:  “So what, they’re all part of some sort of cult?”

• Approach #3: Visual Evidence

Mage:  “Here’s a picture of me casting a fireball.”
Normal:  “Did you draw it or did you use Photoshop?”

• Approach #4: Video Evidence

Mage:  “Here’s a video of me casting a fireball.  Twice.”
Normal:  “Wow, the special effects on that movie are really good.”

• Approach #5: Eyewitness Evidence

Mage:  “Okay, I’m going to blow up those boxes with a fireball right in front of you.  You watching?”
Normal:  “Cool!  Was that some sort of bomb, or a flamethrower, or what?”
Mage:  “I just told you, it was a spell.”
Normal:  “No, seriously, what was it?”

• Approach #6: Repeated Eyewitness Evidence

Mage:  “That’s three fireballs, two flame blades, and I just used a blowtorch on my hand.  Do you believe me yet?”
Normal:  “Look, I admit this is impressive, but why don’t you tell me what you’re really doing?  Are you using some sort of high-tech stuff?”
Mage:  “No!  I’m casting spells!  What do I have to do to make you listen?”
Normal:  “Look, I know magic isn’t real, so whatever you’re doing must be something else.  Either it’s not real fire or you’re wearing asbestos or something.”

• Approach #7: Loss Of Temper

Mage:  “You think THAT’S not real fire?  You believe me NOW, asshole?”

Things generally go downhill from this point on.

This entry was posted in Encyclopaedia Arcana. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Encyclopaedia Arcana #56: Normals and Magic (Part Two)

  1. Serack says:


  2. Nepene says:

    Heh nice.

    I think it might be worth mentioning culture though.

    I have a friend who bought a curse from a witch to deal with some work problem.


    A large segment, perhaps the majority, of Africans believe magic is real.


    The government is actively working to stamp out belief in magic in the UK because it sees links to child abuse.


    13% believe in magic, and 40% believe in ghosts.

    Given recent culture things I think it’s probably more likely that the woman would believe the mage was possessed by a demon or a ghost.

    You would likely find a reasonably large segment of the population who would believe in focuses too, like healing crystals.

    A lot believe in intuition and premonitions too, so our main character wouldn’t have too much problem getting people to believe him.

  3. Benedict says:

    It’s a good point – the next few parts of this article will go into more detail.